MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889683457 · doi:10.1080/23808993.2018.1517026

The genetic risk of second cancers: should the therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia be individualized according to germline genetic makeup?

2018· letter· en· W2889683457 on OpenAlexaff
Kathleen Felton, Christopher C. Porter, Jun J. Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Precision Medicine and Drug Development · 2018
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsLymphoblastic LeukemiaGermlineMedicineOncologyGermline mutationCancer researchInternal medicineGeneticsLeukemiaBiologyMutationGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Risk-adapted combination chemotherapy has improved the prognosis for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) such that more than 85% of children are expected to live disease-free for at least ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of Precision Medicine and Drug DevelopmentSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207