MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889755020 · doi:10.3917/dss.183.0475

« La vérité ne peut être trop claire. » Ésope et ses fables à l’épreuve de la scène dans deux comédies de Boursault

2018· article· fr· W2889755020 on OpenAlexaff
Nicholas Dion

Bibliographic record

VenueDix-septième siècle · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtFablePhilosophyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans Ésope à la ville et Ésope à la cour d’Edme Boursault, la figure du fabuliste infléchit de manière significative l’interprétation morale et la portée satirique des fables. Les choix biographiques et dramaturgiques opérés par l’auteur en sont certes à l’origine : placé en position d’autorité et occupant le rôle de ministre d’État de Crésus, le personnage de Boursault s’éloigne en partie du mythe ésopique, ce qui modifie le statut et la réception de ses fables. Ainsi, le spectateur assiste souvent à un échec flagrant de la fable comme outil de transmission d’une morale : prononcées par l’Ésope de Boursault, les fables ne garantissent pas toujours un accès à la sagesse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.697
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDix-septième siècleSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207