MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889758828 · doi:10.1113/jp276460

Fatigue‐related group III/IV muscle afferent feedback facilitates intracortical inhibition during locomotor exercise

2018· article· en· W2889758828 on OpenAlexaff
Simranjit K. Sidhu, Joshua C. Weavil, Taylor S. Thurston, Dorothea Rosenberger, Jacob E. Jessop, Eivind Wang, Russell S. Richardson, Chris J. McNeil, Markus Amann

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British ColumbiaInterior Health
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteAmerican Heart AssociationU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsSilent periodNeuroscienceTranscranial magnetic stimulationReciprocal inhibitionInhibitory postsynaptic potentialChemistryInterstimulus intervalAfferentMedicinePsychologyStimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key Points This study investigated the influence of group III/IV muscle afferents on corticospinal excitability during cycling exercise and focused on GABA B neuron‐mediated inhibition as a potential underlying mechanism. The study provides novel evidence to demonstrate that group III/IV muscle afferent feedback facilitates inhibitory intracortical neurons during whole body exercise. Firing of these interneurons probably contributes to the development of central fatigue during physical activity. Abstract We investigated the influence of group III/IV muscle afferents in determining corticospinal excitability during cycling exercise and focused on GABA B neuron‐mediated inhibition as a potential underlying mechanism. Both under control conditions (CTRL) and with lumbar intrathecal fentanyl (FENT) impairing feedback from group III/IV leg muscle afferents, subjects ( n = 11) cycled at a comparable vastus‐lateralis EMG signal (∼0.26 mV) before (PRE; 100 W) and immediately after (POST; 90 ± 2 W) fatiguing constant‐load cycling exercise (80% Wpeak; 221 ± 10 W; ∼8 min). During, PRE and POST cycling, single and paired‐pulse (100 ms interstimulus interval) transcranial magnetic stimulations (TMS) were applied to elicit unconditioned and conditioned motor‐evoked potentials (MEPs), respectively. To distinguish between cortical and spinal contributions to the MEPs, cervicomedullary stimulations (CMS) were used to elicit unconditioned (CMS only) and conditioned (TMS+CMS, 100 ms interval) cervicomedullary motor‐evoked potentials (CMEPs). While unconditioned MEPs were unchanged from PRE to POST in CTRL, unconditioned CMEPs increased significantly, resulting in a decrease in unconditioned MEP/CMEP ( P < 0.05). This paralleled a reduction in conditioned MEP ( P < 0.05) and no change in conditioned CMEP. During FENT, unconditioned and conditioned MEPs and CMEPs were similar and comparable during PRE and POST ( P > 0.2). These findings reveal that feedback from group III/IV muscle afferents innervating locomotor muscle decreases the excitability of the motor cortex during fatiguing cycling exercise. This impairment is, at least in part, determined by the facilitating effect of these sensory neurons on inhibitory GABA B intracortical interneurons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.756
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations88
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207