MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889776761 · doi:10.1089/g4h.2018.0029

Xbox 360 Kinect Cognitive Games Improve Slowness, Complexity of EEG, and Cognitive Functions in Subjects with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Control Trial

2018· article· en· W2889776761 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGames for Health Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRiphah International University
KeywordsSlownessCognitionCognitive impairmentPsychologyRandomized controlled trialElectroencephalographyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Physical activity and cognitive training are effective to enhance cognition in older patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Xbox 360 Kinect cognitive games are a combination of physical activity and cognitive training. The objective of this study was to determine the short- and long-term effects of Xbox 360 Kinect cognitive games on slowness and complexity of electroencephalography (EEG) and cognitive functions in older subjects with MCI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A clinical trial was conducted on 44 MCI subjects. Both males and females were randomized into experimental group (participated in Xbox 360 Kinect cognitive games) and control group (range of motion exercises only and no Xbox 360 Kinect cognitive games). Subjects were assessed before and after one session of game intervention for short-term effects and after 6 weeks for long-term effects. The outcome measures were the mini-mental state examination (MMSE), Montreal cognitive assessment scale (MoCA), trail making test (TMT) A and B, and slowness and complexity of EEG. RESULTS: After one session of game intervention, delta (0.704 ± 0.025; P = 0.013), theta (0.128 ± 0.009; P = 0.00127) waves, and complexity of EEG (0.642 ± 0.042; P = 0.008) significantly improved, in eyes closed state. Whereas after 6 weeks intervention of games, delta (0.673 ± 0.029; P = 0.013), theta (0.129 ± 0.013; P = 0.002), beta2 waves (0.044 ± 0.009; P = 0.046), complexity of EEG (0.051 ± 0.042; P = 0.016), MMSE (26.25 ± 0.347 vs. 23.722 ± 0.731; P = 0.003), MoCA (25.65 ± 0.310 vs. 22.00 ± 0.504; P = 0.0001), TMT-A (1.429 ± 0.234 vs. 2.225 ± 0.259; P = 0.028), and TMT-B (2.393 ± 0.201 vs. 3.780 ± 0.195; P = 0.0001) improved significantly. These changes were not observed in the control group. CONCLUSION: Xbox 360 Kinect games showed beneficial effects after short- and long-term intervention on MCI subjects. These games can serve as potential therapeutic candidates for MCI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it