Connecting pattern to process: Growth of spiral shell sculpture in the gastropod <i>Nucella ostrina</i> (Muricidae: Ocenebrinae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Shell morphology is a well-suited and underused system to examine the development of novel forms. The three-dimensional structure produced (the shell) is separate from the largely two-dimensional tissue that secretes it (the mantle), allowing us to disentangle the pattern from the process. Despite knowing a great deal about the mechanics of shell secretion (process), and the variety of shell shapes that exist (pattern), no effort has been made to understand how the mantle changes to produce different shell shapes. We investigated this question in the dimorphic snail Nucella ostrina, which exhibits both smooth and ribbed shells to determine how ribs are formed by the mantle. Rib thickenings are produced only in the outer calcitic shell layer and secreted by the distal Outer Mantle Epithelium (OME) with increased acid phosphatase activity. The evenly thick inner aragonitic layers are secreted by the proximal OME which expresses acid phosphatase. Here we show that locally thicker ribs in N. ostrina are produced by changing the dimensions of the distal OME: elongation in the direction of growth and increased cell height. This should increase the amount of shell material secreted, producing locally thicker shell (ribs). Preliminary evidence suggests this mechanism may be widespread in gastropods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".