MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889862494 · doi:10.1190/segam2018-2997918.1

An optimized approach to compute traveltimes in 3D unstructured meshes

2018· article· en· W2889862494 on OpenAlexaff
Maher Nasr, Bernard Giroux, J. Christian Dupuis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceShortest path problemComputationAlgorithmInversion (geology)Polygon meshComputational scienceComputer graphics (images)GeologyTheoretical computer scienceSeismologyGraphTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an optimized method to calculate traveltimes for seismic inversion. It is a hybrid version of the shortest path approach. The main improvements consist in computing traveltimes using the seismic ray paths and using temporary secondary nodes in vicinity of the source. The proposed method is done following two sequential steps. In the first step, traveltimes are computed for all nodes using the modified shortest path method. Ray paths are then traced back for all source-receiver couples and traveltimes for each receiver are updated using nodes along the ray path. Tests have shown that this approach can improve the accuracy by an order of magnitude and save up to a third of the computation time when compared to the standard shortest path algorithm. Presentation Date: Thursday, October 18, 2018 Start Time: 8:30:00 AM Location: 211A (Anaheim Convention Center) Presentation Type: Oral

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComputational Geometry and Mesh GenerationFrench-language works237,207