Estimating the effect of referral for nephrology care on the survival of adults with advanced chronic kidney disease in a real-world clinical setting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IntroductionLongitudinal studies ascertain exposure, covariates, and outcomes over time. For estimating treatment effect on mortality, ignoring the time-varying nature of an exposure may lead to immortal time bias. Time-dependent confounding that affects future treatment may bias the estimated effects. Differences in baseline prognosis between treatment groups further complicate this issue. Objectives and ApproachWe applied sequential Cox modeling to estimate the causal effect of referral for nephrology care on the survival of adults with advanced chronic kidney disease, linking laboratory and administrative data from Alberta, Canada. We created pseudo-data by mimicking successive randomized controlled trials. To address immortal time bias, each “mini-trial” consisted of individuals starting treatment, and those not yet treated, in each 3-month time interval. We incorporated inverse-probability-of-treatment-weights (IPTW) to minimize treatment selection bias for each “mini-trial. ” We fit a “mini-trial”-stratified, weighted Cox model to estimate the overall hazard ratio for death by averaging the effect estimates across “mini-trials.” ResultsWe included 9,675 patients who entered the cohort between 2002 and 2013. The mean age was 82 years; 35% were male; and 33% were ultimately referred to a nephrologist after a median wait-period of 6 months. Compared to non-referred patients, those referred were younger and had fewer comorbidities at baseline. Referral was associated with a significant 45% lower hazard for death in an adjusted Cox model. The effect was attenuated in a multivariate Cox model with a time-varying exposure and in a sequential Cox model further controlling for potential time-dependent confounding by measures reflecting kidney-, cardiovascular-, and cerebrovascular-health. After incorporating IPTW for addressing treatment selection bias in the same sequential Cox model, the effect estimate was toward the null and no longer significant. Conclusion/ImplicationsWe found that applying analytical strategies that addressed immortal time bias, time-dependent confounding, and treatment selection bias, the survival benefit associated with nephrology referral was attenuated. Inverse-probability-of treatment weighted sequential Cox approach may be used to address these important biases and confounding that are common in real-world clinical settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.068 | 0.150 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".