MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890022354 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2869774

Robust Energy-Efficient Resource Allocation for IoT-Powered Cyber-Physical-Social Smart Systems With Virtualization

2018· article· en· W2890022354 on OpenAlexaff
Yuchen Zhou, F. Richard Yu, Jian Chen, Yonghong Kuo

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceResource allocationProbabilistic logicOptimization problemScheduleResource management (computing)Distributed computingGreedy algorithmMathematical optimizationMaximizationHeuristicComputer networkAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To promote future intelligent systems, a novel cyber-physical-social smart system (CPS3) powered by the Internet of Things is presented in this paper, where wireless network virtualization is adopted to enhance the diversity and the flexibility of the service operation and the system management. Based on the presented system, a robust energy-efficient resource allocation scheme is proposed to guarantee the outage probability requirements of controllers and actuators while realizing the maximization of the system energy efficiency. Different from the existing works, imperfect channel state information is studied for energy-efficient resource allocation in CPS3. To effectively handle the formulated optimization problem, the concept of virtual devices is introduced to equivalently reformulate the original problem. Afterward, the probabilistic mixed problem is approximately transformed into a nonprobabilistic problem though outage probability analyses. After the transformation, the optimization problem can be decomposed into power allocation and channel allocation, where an iterative algorithm for power allocation is adopted to maximize the system energy, and a heuristic greedy algorithm is presented to schedule sensors and actuators on different subchannels based on the obtained power allocation results. Simulation results demonstrate the convergency of the proposed algorithm and the advantages of the proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.701
Threshold uncertainty score0.775

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207