MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890029362 · doi:10.1364/ome.8.003000

Dispersion and anisotropy of thermo-optical properties of Alexandrite laser crystal

2018· article· en· W2890029362 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptical Materials Express · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSolid State Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsMaterials scienceAnisotropyOpticsLaserDispersion (optics)Lens (geology)Polarization (electrochemistry)Crystal (programming language)Refractive indexBirefringenceThermalOptoelectronicsPhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dispersion and anisotropy of thermal coefficients of the optical path (TCOP) and thermo-optic coefficients (TOCs) of Alexandrite laser crystal (Cr3+:BeAl2O4) are studied for the three principal light polarizations, E || a, E || b and E || c. Thermo-optic dispersion formulas are presented for the spectral range of 0.4-1.1 µm. All TOCs are positive and show a notable polarization-anisotropy, dna/dT = 5.9, dnb/dT = 6.9 and dnc/dT = 15.2 × 10−6 K−1 at 0.75 µm. Thermal lensing was characterized in a continuous-wave Alexandrite laser pumped at 0.532 µm and operating at 0.7509 µm (for E || b). The measured thermal lens was weak, positive and slightly astigmatic. The sensitivity factors of the thermal lens were found to be Mx = 1.74 and My = 2.38 [m−1/W].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it