THE NiS+TS PSYCHOGEOGRAPHER’S TABLE: Countering the Official Halifax Explosion Archive
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The material culture of archives is reconsidered in the Psychogeographer's Table (PGT), a counter-archive created by the Narratives in Space + Time Society (NiS+TS) in response to the impending centenary of the accidental catastrophe of the 1917 Halifax Explosion (HE). The PGT counter-archive addresses the relationship between viewer and archive material in a number of novel ways. The subject matter of the archive considers the public geographies shaping our cultural landscape in the Explosion’s debris field, including the militarization of the waterfront and the invisibility of certain racialized and classed communities. The PGT is a portable sculpture and a curated repository of archival materials generated by NiS+TS, exhibited at the Dalhousie University Art Gallery in the fall of 2017. Further, the PGT’s unique materiality is reflected through multiple layers of mapping created through collaborative walking, augmented reality experiences and storytelling. These engagements situate the viewer within the archive, past and present, contrasting the everyday with the catastrophic event.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".