MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890101779 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.170149

Clinical implications of the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)

2018· article· en· W2890101779 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Shannon M. Fernando, Bram Rochwerg, Andrew Seely

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSepsisSeptic shockIntensive care medicineTask (project management)MedicineSevere sepsisTask forceSurviving Sepsis CampaignIntensive careMEDLINEShock (circulatory)Key (lock)Political scienceComputer scienceImmunologyPublic administrationComputer securityLawManagementInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

KEY POINTS Many physicians may not be aware that the term “sepsis” has undergone a change in definition that is important for research and for our understanding of its management. A joint task force of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations149
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207