Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le 8 septembre 1760, le gouverneur de la Nouvelle-France signe la capitulation de Montreal. L'evenement marque la conquete du Canada par les armes. Les forces francaises sont sommees de se rendre a l'ennemi britannique. Pourtant, deux factions des troupes de la Marine du Canada, l'une de Michillimakinac et l'autre du fort Detroit, feront fi de ces ordres et se replieront en Louisiane, encore sous le controle des Francais. En insistant sur les deux officiers a la tete de ces hommes, Pierre Passerat de La Chapelle et Louis Lienard de Beaujeu, c'est tout un pan oublie de l'histoire de la Conquete qui est raconte, celui d'hommes qui ont refuse d'etre conquis. Joseph Gagne est un historien originaire du Nouvel-Ontario qui etudie au doctorat a l'Universite Laval. Actif au Quebec, en Ontario et aux Etats-Unis, il a un interet particulier pour le Regime francais dans la region des Grands Lacs. Il a fonde et administre le portail Internet Nouvelle-France electronique et le blogue Curieuse Nouvelle-France.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".