Synthesis of prednisolone molecularly imprinted polymer nanoparticles by precipitation polymerization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The prednisolone molecularly imprinted polymer nanoparticles (prednisolone‐MIPs) were prepared via precipitation polymerization. The synthetic conditions were performed by optimizing of functional monomers (acrylamide and methacrylic acid) and crosslinkers (ethylene glycol dimethacrylate and pentaerythritol triacrylate) with defined the synthetic ratio of template molecule:functional monomer:crosslinker as 1:7:30. The acquired MIPs were studied for their binding quantitation by kinetic adsorption analysis. Two of four synthetic conditions reached an equilibrium binding capacity at 960 minutes. In addition, the equilibrium adsorption, kinetic models, adsorption isotherms, and molecular selectivity were also evaluated in this study. The pseudo‐second order was the best fitted kinetic model with good agreement on Langmuir isotherm of both optimum conditions. The molecular recognition of prednisolone‐MIPs was further carried out to demonstrate the selectivity performance and found that prednisolone‐MIPs had a good recognition to target prednisolone rather than structural analogue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it