MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890128432 · doi:10.1386/public.29.57.217_7

Making Pancakes: Intergenerational Cooking and Remediating the Archive

2018· article· en· W2890128432 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePublic · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia, Gender, and Advertising
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecipePerformative utteranceSubject (documents)Event (particle physics)SociologyVisual artsAestheticsHistoryArtComputer scienceLibrary scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In Making Pancakes, Alejandra Bronfman remediates the recipe Cakes para el Desayuno as a response to Aceves Sepúlveda’s great grandmother MamáPina’s cookbook. Along with her mother, Marisa Bronfman, her daughters Maia and Nina Dawson, and her partner Alec Dawson as the videographer, Bronfman sets up a cooking event in which three different generations interpret the recipe from their distinct subject positions. For this issue of Public, we propose to transcribe the intergenerational conversations that took place in Making Pancakes to unpack the ways knowledge is transferred from generation to generation and to reflect on the ways in which female domestic forms of writing and familial performative acts can be considered as central foci of the Archive. We will contextualize the transcription with still images from the video and a self-reflective response on cooking as remediation by Bronfman and Aceves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it