MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890154962 · doi:10.1111/tla.12209

Labor Relations in Mexico (1988-2012): Explaining Continuity across Regime Types and Economic Models

2018· article· en· W2890154962 on OpenAlexaff
Jean François Mayer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Latin Americanist · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemocratizationDemocracyLegislationIncentiveEconomicsLabor relationsPoliticsIndustrial relationsEmployment protection legislationLabour lawLabour economicsPolitical scienceMarket economyEconomic growthUnemploymentLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite Mexico's shift to a market-based economic model and transition to democracy, two processes that should have yielded changes in labour legislation and the practice of labour relations, neither significant flexibilization of the labour code nor democratization of labour relations occurred between 1988 and 2012. My research indicates that this high degree of continuity is mainly attributable to the specific configuration taken by the country's neoliberal economic model. This configuration generated a structure of incentives for political and labour elites to favour the persistence of non-democratic patterns of labour relations and to leave the country's labour legislation essentially untouched.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Latin AmericanistSame topicEmployment and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207