Conception des sciences d’élèves de 4e secondaire engagés dans une démarche interdisciplinaire d’enseignement des sciences sur les changements climatiques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte présente un portrait de la conception des sciences d’élèves de 4e secondaire à la suite de la mise à l’essai d’une démarche d’enseignement interdisciplinaire autour d’une question socialement vive à caractère environnemental (QSVE), celle des changements climatiques dans six classes de sciences de 4e secondaire de la région de Québec. Les résultats tirés de l’analyse d’entretiens semi-dirigés avec les élèves illustrent l’intérêt de notre démarche pour les élèves et précise comment elle a enrichi leur conception des sciences. Il semble que la stratégie pédagogique privilégiée permette d’enrichir certains aspects de considérations plus actuelles sur les pratiques de recherche et les incertitudes en jeu. Les formes d’engagement citoyen que mettent de l’avant les élèves au terme de la démarche sont aussi abordées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".