Design of Optimal Scalar Quantizer for Sequential Coding of Correlated Sources
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper addresses the design of a sequential scalar quantizer (SSQ) for finite-alphabet correlated sources in the fixed-rate (FR) and entropy-constrained (EC) cases. The optimization problem is formulated as the minimization of a weighted sum of distortions and rates. The proposed solution is globally optimal for the class of SSQs with convex cells and is based on solving the minimum-weight path (MWP) problem in the EC case, respectively, a length-constrained MWP problem in the FR case, in a series of weighted directed acyclic graphs. The asymptotic time complexity is O(K12K22), where K1and K2are the respective sizes of the alphabets of the two sources. Additionally, it is proved that, by applying the proposed algorithms to discretizations of correlated sources with continuous joint probability density function, the performance approaches that of the optimal EC-SSQ, respectively, FR-SSQ, with convex cells for the original sources as the accuracy of the discretization increases. Extensive experiments performed with correlated Gaussian sources validate the effectiveness in practice of the proposed approach in approximating the optimal SSQ for the case of continuous-alphabet sources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".