MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890326413 · doi:10.1113/jp276923

Differential targeting and signalling of voltage‐gated T‐type Ca<sub>v</sub>3.2 and L‐type Ca<sub>v</sub>1.2 channels to ryanodine receptors in mesenteric arteries

2018· article· en· W2890326413 on OpenAlexafffund
Gang Fan, Mario Kaßmann, Ahmed M. Hashad, Donald G. Welsh, Maik Gollasch

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIon channel regulation and function
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchChina Scholarship CouncilBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftDeutscher Akademischer AustauschdienstDeutsches Zentrum für Herz-KreislaufforschungAlberta Innovates - Health SolutionsGovernment of Canada
KeywordsRyanodine receptorVascular smooth muscleMesenteric arteriesCaveolaeReceptorChemistryVoltage-dependent calcium channelVasodilationStretch-activated ion channelBiophysicsEndocrinologyInternal medicineCell biologyAnatomyBiologyIon channelCalciumSignal transductionBiochemistrySmooth muscleVoltage-gated ion channelMedicineArtery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key points In arterial smooth muscle, Ca2+ sparks are elementary Ca2+‐release events generated by ryanodine receptors (RyRs) to cause vasodilatation by opening maxi Ca2+‐sensitive K+ (BKCa) channels. This study elucidated the contribution of T‐type Cav3.2 channels in caveolae and their functional interaction with L‐type Cav1.2 channels to trigger Ca2+ sparks in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Our data demonstrate that L‐type Cav1.2 channels provide the predominant Ca2+ pathway for the generation of Ca2+ sparks in murine arterial VSMCs. T‐type Cav3.2 channels represent an additional source for generation of VSMC Ca2+ sparks. They are located in pit structures of caveolae to provide locally restricted, tight coupling between T‐type Cav3.2 channels and RyRs to ignite Ca2+ sparks. Abstract Recent data suggest that T‐type Cav3.2 channels in arterial vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and pits structure of caveolae could contribute to elementary Ca2+ signalling (Ca2+ sparks) via ryanodine receptors (RyRs) to cause vasodilatation. While plausible, their precise involvement in igniting Ca2+ sparks remains largely unexplored. The goal of this study was to elucidate the contribution of caveolar Cav3.2 channels and their functional interaction with Cav1.2 channels to trigger Ca2+ sparks in VSMCs from mesenteric, tibial and cerebral arteries. We used tamoxifen‐inducible smooth muscle‐specific Cav1.2−/− (SMAKO) mice and laser scanning confocal microscopy to assess Ca2+ spark generation in VSMCs. Ni2+, Cd2+ and methyl‐β‐cyclodextrin were used to inhibit Cav3.2 channels, Cav1.2 channels and caveolae, respectively. Ni2+ (50 μmol L−1) and methyl‐β‐cyclodextrin (10 mmol L−1) decreased Ca2+ spark frequency by ∼20–30% in mesenteric VSMCs in a non‐additive manner, but failed to inhibit Ca2+ sparks in tibial and cerebral artery VSMCs. Cd2+ (200 μmol L−1) suppressed Ca2+ sparks in mesenteric arteries by ∼70–80%. A similar suppression of Ca2+ sparks was seen in mesenteric artery VSMCs of SMAKO mice. The remaining Ca2+ sparks were fully abolished by Ni2+ or methyl‐β‐cyclodextrin. Our data demonstrate that Ca2+ influx through CaV1.2 channels is the primary means of triggering Ca2+ sparks in murine arterial VSMCs. CaV3.2 channels, localized to caveolae and tightly coupled to RyR, provide an additional Ca2+ source for Ca2+ spark generation in mesenteric, but not tibial and cerebral, arteries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicIon channel regulation and functionFrench-language works237,207