ІВАН ОГІЄНКО ТА ЙОГО «ГРАМАТИЧНО-СТИЛІСТИЧНИЙ СЛОВНИК ШЕВЧЕНКОВОЇ МОВИ»
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The incipience of Shevchenko studiesas linguistic branch starts in the beginning of XX century. Many studies devoted to manifold genres, life and oeuvre of the ukrainian man of extraordinary genius appeared as a result of under centenary development of Shevchenko studies. But the central was three lexicographical works: “Vocabulary of Shevchenko’s language” (1861), “Shevchenko’s vocabulary” (1976) and “Grammar-stylistic vocabulary of Shevchenko’s language” (1961). The first and second books were published in Ukraine, and the last one - in Winnipeg. It was created by Ivan Ogienko. The goal of “Vocabulary of Shevchenko’s language” was “to fix the variety of the poet’s lexicon and different means of its usage, in particular semantic-stylistic special aspects”. The authors of the work give all Ukrainian vocabulary, used by T. Shevchenko in his creations. The researchwas made on the collected works in ten volumes (Kyiv, 1949-1963). It was philology catalogue, which gives prevalent characteristics of Kobzar’s word. There was registered and explained 10 116 words. Lexicographic work made by I. Ogienko had different and common features to “Vocabulary of Shevchenko’s language”. “Grammar-stylistic vocabulary of Shevchenko’s language” was the last one book of the collections of works in five volumes made by Metropolitan Ilarion. “Grammar-stylistic vocabulary of Shevchenko’s language” dedicated to the studies formation, developing and function of standard modern Ukrainian language. The authordidn’t use all words of Shevchenko’s works, written in Ukrainian. He used only that, which have “practical goal in studying our modern Ukrainian”. That’s why discarded I. Ogienko statistics information. Consequently, I. Ogienko used in this vocabulary such material, which can cater to study the formation and development modern standard language. “Grammar-stylistic vocabulary of Shevchenko’s language” gives us wide potentialities for studying standard Ukrainian in the process of incipience and formation. I. Ogienko planned that Vocabulary would have practical usage as a grammar-stylistic vocabulary for wide range of people. It would be vocabulary and reference book based on Shevchenko’s language. I. Ogienko said that there was necessity to publish “Kobzar”, in which there would be saved Shevchenko’s orthography. Key words: dictionary, dictionary article, structure of a dictionary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.130 | 0.173 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".