MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890398481 · doi:10.31849/pb.v5i1.1230

Makna Kearifan Lokal Arsitektur Rumah Tradisional Melayu Bengkalis Negeri Junjungan

2018· article· id· W2890398481 on OpenAlexaff
Boby Samra, Imbardi Imbardi

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Pustaka Budaya · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitectural and Urban Studies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pada tahun 1512, Sultan Mahmud Syah mengutus Hang Nadim ke Bengkalis, Bukit Batu dan Siak-Gasib. Pada hakikatnya sejarah dan tamadun Bengkalis tidak terputus, bahkan data-data yang mendukung tentang kewujudan Bengkalis dapat ditemui dalam beberapa buku sejarah. Bengkalis maju dan berkembang seiring dengan kemajuan daerah-daerah lain yang ada di pesisir Selat Malaka, Pertumbuhan penduduk dan ekonomi pada masa ini menjadikan bangunan-bangunan arsitektur tradisional bercirikas melayu pada kawasan tersebut sudah mulai hilang dimakan usia dan tergusur oleh kebijakan. kebudayaan material dan spiritual dari berbagai etnik, strata sosial, ekonomi dan system pemerintahan kejayaan pada masa lalu yang sekarang disebut negeri junjungan, yang dapat dilihat melalui bentuk-bentuk bangunan dengan susunan lingkungan yang ada. Dengan melakukan analisis dan pendataan tentang budaya lokal serta implementasi perwujudan rumah sebagai identitas. Sehingga rumah bukan saja sebagai tempat kehidupan keseharian, tetapi juga menjadi kebanggaan dan lambang kesempurnaan hidup masyarakat yang bermukim pada lingkungan tersebut.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.158

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Pustaka BudayaSame topicArchitectural and Urban StudiesFrench-language works237,207