MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890454482 · doi:10.1063/1.5056311

Surface acoustic wave modes in two-dimensional shallow void inclusion phononic crystals on GaAs

2019· article· en· W2890454482 on OpenAlexafffund
Edward Muzar, J. A. H. Stotz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsAcoustic metamaterialsVoid (composites)Materials scienceInclusion (mineral)Condensed matter physicsSurface waveSurface acoustic waveComposite materialAcoustic waveAcousticsPhysicsGeologyOpticsMineralogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The possibility to control supersonic acoustic wave propagation is intriguing, but when modeling phononic crystal devices, supersonic surface acoustic waves are mired by radiative attenuation and, hence, eschewed in many device designs. In this paper, we study supersonic surface acoustic wave modes in shallow hole phononic crystals computationally with respect to the three bulk wave sound barriers of cubic (001) GaAs. From a first principles modeling approach of linear elasticity, the finite element method, and with the aid of characterization parameters for systematic modal categorization, detailed nuances are observed for supersonic surface waves propagating along the [110]-direction of GaAs with a periodically patterned surface. Modes of interest are distinguished by possessing both strain energy and squared polarization ratios above defined thresholds. The square array of shallow inclusions imparts a metamaterial surface layer effect that results in marked changes in the dispersion, the bulk wave hybridization, and the modal interactions of the surface modes in the Γ-X direction of the phononic crystal, which are characterized by their modal profiles and attenuation via bulk wave radiation. From these findings, we propose an extended sound cone concept to accommodate supersonic surface acoustic waves with low attenuation. Furthermore, at frequencies above the shear vertical bulk dispersion line, well-bounded surface acoustic wave modes are revealed, and the phenomenon of these supersonic modes with limited bulk wave coupling is explored. From these detailed band structures, the systematic method of mode characterization reveals deeper insights into modes that exist in shallow phononic crystals on cubic GaAs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score0.869

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicAcoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchFrench-language works237,207