MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Physical Activity and Work Productivity in Response to Iron and Iodine Double‐Fortified Salt Trial in Indian Tea Estate Workers

2016· article· en· W2890457265 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mia M. Blakstad, Julie Nevins, Sudha Venkatramanan, Eric M. Przybyszewski, Jere D. Haas

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBody Composition Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversitySte. Anne's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIodised saltIodine deficiencyIron deficiencyMicronutrientPopulationAnemiaIodineEnvironmental healthInternal medicineChemistryThyroid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Iron deficiency is the most common micronutrient deficiency in the world, with prevalence estimates for women in low‐income countries ranging between 15 and 50%. Iron is essential for oxygen transport through hemoglobin (Hb), and iron deficiency can lead to decreased physical work capacity. The relationship between iron and work capacity suggests that iron deficient individuals could experience reduced work productivity. We used accelerometry data to determine whether improvements in iron status from an intervention of salt double‐fortified with iron and iodine (DFS) increased the physical activity (PA) and efficiency of work performed by female tea pluckers. Population Participants were 212 experienced tea pluckers between 18 and 55 years from a large tea estate in Darjeeling District of northern West Bengal, India. Methods Two groups were randomly assigned to receive either salt fortified with potassium iodate, or iodized salt that was additionally fortified with microencapsulated ferrous fumarate (3.3 mg/g salt). Over the 10‐month intervention, women received salt only from the study. All measurements were taken at both baseline and end line. Participants self‐reported ethnicity as Adivasi or Nepali. Weight, height, mid‐upper arm circumference (MUAC) and age were measured by trained research staff. Venous blood was analyzed for Hb, serum ferritin (sFt), and soluble transferrin receptor. Physical activity levels were assessed with ActiGraph GT3x tri‐axial accelerometers worn on the hip daily for six days, except when sleeping or bathing. Energy expenditure during the work day was estimated from heart rate, and productivity was measured as the amount of tea plucked (kg) from morning and afternoon weighing. Results Mean (SD) change in minutes from baseline to endline spent at sedentary (<1 MET), light (1–3 MET), and moderate‐to‐rigorous (>3 MET) physical activity during plucking were 32.7 (160.8), 5.6 (75.5), and 6.7 (44.2) respectively. Neither the intervention, change in iron status, energy expenditure, energetic efficiency, nor amount of tea plucked were consistent predictors of PA, even after controlling for potential confounders. Conclusion We found that, contradictory to previous findings, improvements in iron status did not improve physical performance or worker productivity in these Indian tea estate workers. The results should be interpreted in light of the very different tea plucking conditions observed during the study period. Our results may highlight the need for measures of work productivity that are more sensitive to changes in iron status. Support or Funding Information Funded by the Micronutrient Initiative (MI) of Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.593
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicBody Composition Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207