MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890475708

An Experimental Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Pre-operative Strengthening Exercises on Functional Outcome of Patients after Total Knee Replacement Surgery

2016· dissertation· en· W2890475708 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S Malli Seri

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Education and Admissions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhysical therapyWOMACOutcome (game theory)Knee replacementOxford knee scoreMedical-surgical nursingSurgeryOsteoarthritisArthroplastyNursingAlternative medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: An Experimental Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Pre-operative Strengthening Exercises on Functional Outcome of Patients after Total Knee Replacement Surgery. OBJECTIVES: 1. To assess the level of functional outcome between the control and the experimental groups of patients after Total Knee Replacement Surgery 2. To determine the effectiveness of pre-operative strengthening exercises on functional outcome by comparing the control and the experimental groups of patients after Total Knee Replacement Surgery 3. To assess the level of satisfaction of patients on pre-operative strengthening exercises among experimental group of patients after Total Knee Replacement Surgery 4. To find out the association between selected demographic variables and functional outcome among the control and the experimental groups of patients after Total Knee Replacement Surgery 5. To assess the association between selected clinical variables and functional outcome among the control and the experimental groups of patients after Total Knee Replacement Surgery The Conceptual framework of the present study was based on King’s Goal Attainment theory (Martha, 2013) given by Imogene King which was modified for the study. The study variables were pre-operative strengthening exercises and functional outcome. An extensive literature review and guidance by the experts formed the foundations for the development of the demographic variable proforma, clinical variable proforma, WOMAC score and rating scale on the level of satisfaction about pre-operative strengthening exercises. A quasi experimental research approach was used for achieving the objectives of the study. The present study was conducted in Apollo Main Hospitals. A sample size of 60 patients who met the inclusion criteria were chosen for the study. By purposive sampling technique, 30 patients in each group viz. the control and the experimental group were selected by the researcher for data collection. The investigator used the demographic and clinical variables proforma of patients to obtain the baseline data. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) was used for assessing the scale of difficulty with sub scales on pain, stiffness and physical function and rating scale for assessing the level of satisfaction of patients regarding pre-operative strengthening exercises. The data collection tools were validated and reliability was established. After the pilot study, the data collection of the main study was conducted for a period of 6 weeks. The level of satisfaction regarding administration of pre-operative strengthening exercises was then assessed. The collected information was tabulated and analyzed by using appropriate descriptive and inferential statistics. The Major Findings of the Study were, 1. A significant percentage of the patients scheduled for TKR were in the age group of 61-70 years (40%, 46.6%) with the mean age and SD of 62.5+/- SD 9.7, 61.6 +/- 8.4, were females (66.6%, 60%), married (86.6%, 93.3%), non-vegetarian (60%, 80%), moderate workers (43.3%, 46.6%) with monthly family income Rs.50,000 - 1,00,000 (53.3%,56.6%) and graduates (53.3%, 53.3%) in control and experimental groups of patients respectively. 2. Most of the patients scheduled for TKR had no previous history of surgery within 5 years (80%, 80%), no history of trauma (83.3%, 86.6%), had OA in the past 5-10 years (73.3%, 66.6%), had body mass index (80%, 86.6 %) within 22-25 in the control and the experimental groups respectively. Nearly half of the patients (43.3%, 50%) had no co-morbidity in both the groups. Only very few patients had knee pain for 8-12 hours (16.6%, 13.3%), had taken NSAID (50%, 56.3%) and analgesics (50%, 46.6%) and had not used any narcotics for pain in control and experimental groups respectively. 3. The control group and the experimental group had average level of functional outcome (80%, 100%) in the first observation. 4. In the second observation, 93.3% of the experimental group had achieved good functional outcome whereas the entire control group had only average level (100%) of functional outcome. But the experimental group of patients had average level of functional outcome of 6.6%. There was no one in poor level of functional outcome in the second observation. 5. The mean and the standard deviation of WOMAC scale of difficulty on functional outcome in the first observation was (M = 49.9, SD = 3.67) for the experimental group whereas the mean and the standard deviation of the control group was M =59.9, SD = 4.05. This was found to be statistically significant at p < 0.001. 6. In the second observation, the mean and the standard deviation of WOMAC scale of difficulty on functional outcome (M= 28.0, SD = 2.80) in experimental group was less than that of the control group (M= 39.3, SD = 3.03). This was found to be statistically significant at p < 0.001 in the first and the second observations. This may be attributed to the effectiveness of the pre-operative strengthening exercises on functional outcome of patients after Total Knee Replacement surgery. Hence, the null hypothesis HO1 “There will be no significant difference in the functional outcome with pre-operative strengthening exercises among the control and the experimental groups of patients after Total Knee Replacement Surgery” was rejected. 7. A majority of the patients in the experimental group were highly satisfied with the method of teaching pre-operative strengthening exercises (96.6%), the effectiveness of the therapy (100%) and the approach of researcher (100%). 8. There was no significant association between the selected demographic variables, namely, age, gender, educational, marital status, nature of work, monthly family income and dietary habits in the control and the experimental groups of patients. Hence, the null hypothesis HO2 “There will be no significant association between selected demographic variables and functional outcome of patients among the control and experimental groups of patients after Total Knee Replacement Surgery” was retained. 9. There was no significant association between selected clinical variables like co-morbidity, previous history of surgery within 5 years, BMI, history of trauma, duration of OA, frequency of exercises, duration of exercise, duration of knee pain in 24 hours and medication taken for pain in the control and the experimental groups of patients. Hence, the null hypothesis HO3 with regard to these variables was retained. Recommendations The researcher recommends the following: 1. A similar study could be undertaken on a larger scale for more valid generalization. 2. This study could be replicated in different settings. 3. The study could be conducted for comparing different modalities of teaching exercises as eg. Simulation. 4. The study could be conducted by using a variety of tools to assess the functional outcome. 5. The study could be replicated by comparing individual and group methods of teaching exercises. 6. This study could be replicated with a long term follow up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Education and AdmissionsFrench-language works237,207