MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890475738 · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slz025

Large Ly α opacity fluctuations and low CMB τ in models of late reionization with large islands of neutral hydrogen extending to <i>z</i> &amp;lt; 5.5

2019· article· en· W2890475738 on OpenAlexaff
Girish Kulkarni, Laura C. Keating, Martin G. Haehnelt, Sarah E. I. Bosman, Ewald Puchwein, Jonathan Chardin, Dominique Aubert

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilScience and Technology Facilities CouncilCentral Laser Facility, Science and Technology Facilities CouncilEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilDurham UniversityBritish Interplanetary Society
KeywordsReionizationPhysicsAstrophysicsOpacityCosmic microwave backgroundHydrogenAstronomyGalaxyAnisotropyRedshift

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract High-redshift quasi-stellar object (QSO) spectra show large spatial fluctuations in the Ly α opacity of the intergalactic medium on surprisingly large scales at $z$ ≳ 5.5. We present a radiative transfer simulation of cosmic reionization driven by galaxies that reproduces this large scatter and the rapid evolution of the Ly α opacity distribution at 5 < $z$ < 6. The simulation also reproduces the low Thomson scattering optical depth reported by the latest cosmic microwave background (CMB) measurement and is consistent with the observed short near-zones and strong red damping wings in the highest redshift QSOs. It also matches the rapid disappearance of observed Ly α emission by galaxies at $z$ ≳ 6. Reionization is complete at $z$ = 5.3 in our model, and 50 per cent of the volume of the Universe is ionized at $z$ = 7. Agreement with the Ly α forest data in such a late reionization model requires a rapid evolution of the ionizing emissivity of galaxies that peaks at $z$ ∼ 6.8. The late end of reionization results in a large scatter in the photoionization rate and the neutral hydrogen fraction at redshifts as low as $z$ ≲ 5.5 with large residual neutral ‘islands’ that can produce very long Gunn–Peterson troughs resembling those seen in the data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations263
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society LettersSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207