M-theory exotic scalar glueball decays to mesons at finite coupling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Using the pull-back of the perturbed type IIA metric corresponding to the perturbation of [1]’s M-theory uplift of [2]’s UV-complete top-down type IIB holographic dual of large-N thermal QCD, at finite coupling, we obtain the interaction Lagrangian corresponding to exotic scalar glueball(G E )-ρ/π-meson interaction, linear in the exotic scalar glueball and up to quartic order in the π mesons. In the Lagrangian the coupling constants are determined as (radial integrals of) [1]’s M-theory uplift’s metric components and six radial functions appearing in the M-theory metric perturbations. Assuming M G > 2M ρ , we then compute ρ → 2π, G E → 2π, 2ρ, ρ + 2π decay widths as well as the direct and indirect (mediated via ρ mesons) G E → 4π decays. For numerics, we choose f 0[1710] and compare with previous calculations. We emphasize that our results can be made to match PDG data (and improvements thereof) exactly by appropriate tuning of some constants of integration appearing in the solution of the M-theory metric perturbations and the ρ and π meson radial profile functions — a flexibility that our calculations permits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".