Onset of feeding in juvenile sea urchins and its relation to nutrient signalling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purple sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, has been the focus of extensive ecological and developmental research over the years. Strongylocentrotus purpuratus larvae transition into the juvenile stage after an extensive planktonic period. The metamorphic transition is characterized by dramatic changes in morphology and physiology of the juvenile compared to the larval form and mechanisms underlying this process, especially the early days post-settlement, remain poorly understood. We used SEM and phalloidin stain analysis as well as whole mount in situ hybridization to gain a detailed understanding of juvenile development in relation to nutrient signalling [insulin-like growth factor (IIS), FoxO (forkhead box, sub-group ‘O’) and TOR (target of rampamycin), also known as IIS/TOR/FoxO signalling]. Our results show that the majority of juvenile feeding features are fully developed only after 8-days of juvenile development, leaving an extensive period of nutritional stress. We found that FoxO gene expression increases during that time period and is localized in juvenile tube feet, potentially associated with sensory structures involved in nutrient signalling. Our data complement existing work on sea urchin juvenile development and shed new light on the perimetamorphic period of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, with respect to nutrient signalling and the potential stressful pre-feeding period of juvenile sea urchins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".