MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890560434 · doi:10.1521/jsyt.2018.37.1.18

Therapists of Color: Surviving Long Enough to Keep Fighting

2018· article· en· W2890560434 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Christine Ajayi Beliard, Porshia R. Cunningham, Franchesca Fontus, Danielle R. Moye

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Systemic Therapies · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCounseling Practices and Supervision
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite (mutation)RacismPeople of colorPsychologySubject (documents)Quality (philosophy)Mental healthSocial psychologyPsychotherapistSociologyGender studiesEpistemologyComputer scienceRace (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As therapists of color, it is important for us to acknowledge a particular and compelling larger systems issue: how racism contributes to poor mental health and relationship quality for African Americans (Kelly & Hudson, 2016) in comparison to their White counterparts. This creates challenges for therapists and supervisors as well as our clients. The issue of much-needed self-care and support for therapists of color, and the corresponding requirements for White allies in the struggle, are the subject of our case examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.340
Threshold uncertainty score0.797

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Systemic TherapiesSame topicCounseling Practices and SupervisionFrench-language works237,207