Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Various analogies between fluid dynamics and electromagnetism can be found in the literature. It follows that the conservation equations of mass and momentum can be put in the form of Maxwell’s equations, with the convective acceleration corresponding to the electric field and the vorticity to the magnetic field. These equations are non linear because of the convective acceleration term. To obtain linear equations we decompose the variables in a stationary part representing equilibrium, and an unsteady part representing a deviation from equilibrium. Writing the conservation equations of mass and momentum with a first order approximation in the form of Maxwell’s equations allows us to put in relation the perturbation of pressure and velocity with the perturbation of vorticity and centripetal acceleration. These equations describe the oscillation of a vortex flow. An oscillating vortex is characterised by the oscillations of the centripetal acceleration and the vorticity fields which are comparable to the oscillations of the electric and magnetic fields. This analogy suggests that atmospheric phenomena such as tornadoes have a wavelike behaviour that is comparable to EM waves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it