MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2890624386 · doi:10.1190/segam2018-2996043.1

The comprehensive PS-wave static correction technique used for Canadian oil sand reservoirs

2018· article· en· W2890624386 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jun Yang, Chai Wei, Huidong Yang, Ning Bin, Na Lei

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyOil sandsPetroleum engineeringGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multi-wave seismic exploration, which utilizes P-wave, S-wave and PS-wave, is an effective method for the fine exploration of petroliferous basin. The oil sands in the MacKay region are mainly lithologic reservoirs, which vary laterally. The swamp area in the surface is very big and distributed in unbalance. The near surface is complex and varied. The PS-wave residual statics is obtained by the common receiver point stack cross-correlation method controlled by PP and PS-wave structure time and the integrated global optimized static correction method. The continuity and signal to noise ratio (SNR) of seismic sections are improved obviously. The accurate imaging of PS-wave data proves the validity and reliability of the method in this paper. It provides important geophysical exploration results for the development of oil sands. Presentation Date: Monday, October 15, 2018 Start Time: 1:50:00 PM Location: 213A (Anaheim Convention Center) Presentation Type: Oral

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.533
Threshold uncertainty score0.928

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques→French-language works237,207→