Pharmacological Modulation of Right Ventricular Endocardial-Epicardial Gradients in Brugada Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background We explored the hypothesis that increased cholinergic tone exerts its proarrhythmic effects in Brugada syndrome (BrS) through increasing dispersion of transmural repolarization in patients with spontaneous and drug-induced BrS. Methods BrS and supraventricular tachycardia patients were studied after deploying an Ensite Array in the right ventricular outflow tract and a Cardima catheter in the great cardiac vein to record endo and epicardial signals, respectively. S 1 -S 2 restitution curves from the right ventricular apex were conducted at baseline and after edrophonium challenge to promote increased cholinergic tone. The local unipolar electrograms were then analyzed to study transmural conduction and repolarization dynamics. Results The study included 8 BrS patients (5 men:3 women; mean age, 56 years) and 8 controls patients with supraventricular tachycardia (5 men:3 women; mean age, 48 years). Electrophysiological studies in controls demonstrated shorter endocardial than epicardial right ventricular activation times (mean difference: 26 ms; P <0.001). In contrast, patients with BrS showed longer endocardial than epicardial activation time (mean difference: −15 ms; P =0.001). BrS hearts, compared with controls, showed significantly larger transmural gradients in their activation recovery intervals (mean intervals, 20.5 versus 3.5 ms; P <0.01), with longer endocardial than epicardial activation recovery intervals. Edrophonium challenge increased such gradients in both controls (to a mean of 16 ms [ P <0.001]) and BrS (to 29.7 ms; P <0.001). However, these were attributable to epicardial and endocardial activation recovery interval prolongations in control and BrS hearts, respectively. Dynamic changes in repolarization gradients were also observed across the BrS right ventricular wall in BrS. Conclusions Differential contributions of conduction and repolarization were identified in BrS which critically modulated transmural dispersion of repolarization with significant cholinergic effects only identified in the patients with BrS. This has important implications for explaining the proarrhythmic effects of increased vagal tone in BrS, as well as evaluating autonomic modulation and epicardial ablation as therapeutic strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".