PRESM: personalized reference editor for somatic mutation discovery in cancer genomics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Accurate detection of somatic mutations is a crucial step toward understanding cancer. Various tools have been developed to detect somatic mutations from cancer genome sequencing data by mapping reads to a universal reference genome and inferring likelihoods from complex statistical models. However, read mapping is frequently obstructed by mismatches between germline and somatic mutations on a read and the reference genome. Previous attempts to develop personalized genome tools are not compatible with downstream statistical models for somatic mutation detection. RESULTS: We present PRESM, a tool that builds personalized reference genomes by integrating germline mutations into the reference genome. The aforementioned obstacle is circumvented by using a two-step germline substitution procedure, maintaining positional fidelity using an innovative workaround. Reads derived from tumor tissue can be positioned more accurately along a personalized reference than a universal reference due to the reduced genetic distance between the subject (tumor genome) and the target (the personalized genome). Application of PRESM's personalized genome reduced false-positive (FP) somatic mutation calls by as much as 55.5%, and facilitated the discovery of a novel somatic point mutation on a germline insertion in PDE1A, a phosphodiesterase associated with melanoma. Moreover, all improvements in calling accuracy were achieved without parameter optimization, as PRESM itself is parameter-free. Hence, similar increases in read mapping and decreases in the FP rate will persist when PRESM-built genomes are applied to any user-provided dataset. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software is available at https://github.com/precisionomics/PRESM. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.092 | 0.054 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".