MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890744168 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.184401

Low-temperature and dynamic magnetism of highly frustrated <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>Li</mml:mi><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>MgOsO</mml:mi><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> polymorphs in comparison with <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>Li</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>Mg</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>OsO</mml:mi><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2018· article· lv· W2890744168 on OpenAlexafffund
Gia Thinh Tran, Phuong‐Hieu T. Nguyen, Charles J. Bloed, M. E. Evans, J. A. Anczarski, William Patrick Martin, Jefferson Toro, Demetrios Papakostas, J. Beare, M. N. Wilson, John E. Greedan, G. M. Luke, Thomas Gredig, J. P. Carlo, Shahab Derakhshan

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2018
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsBrockhouse Institute for Materials ResearchTRIUMFMcMaster University
FundersTRIUMFW. M. Keck FoundationResearch Corporation for Science AdvancementNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAntiferromagnetismFrustrationMagnetismMonoclinic crystal systemSpin glassMagnetic susceptibilityCondensed matter physicsOrthorhombic crystal systemRelaxation (psychology)Muon spin spectroscopyMaterials sciencePhysicsCrystallographyChemistryCrystal structurePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0080.016
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.014
Bibliometrics0.0040.011
Science and technology studies0.0100.013
Scholarly communication0.0090.010
Open science0.0160.014
Research integrity0.0120.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7030.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207