Modeling and Optimization for Collaborative Business Process Towards IoT Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid development of Internet of Things (IoT) attracts growing attention from both industry and academia. IoT seamlessly connects the real world and cyberspace via various business process applications hosted on the IoT devices, especially on smart sensors. Due to the discrete distribution and complex sensing environment, multiple coordination patterns exist in the heterogeneous sensor networks, making modeling and analysis particularly difficult. In addition, massive sensing events need to be routed, forwarded and processed in the distributed execution environment. Therefore, the corresponding sensing event scheduling algorithm is highly desired. In this paper, we propose a novel modeling methodology and optimization algorithm for collaborative business process towards IoT applications. We initially extend the traditional Petri nets with sensing event factor. Then, the formal modeling specification is investigated and the existing coordination patterns, including event unicasting pattern, event broadcasting pattern, and service collaboration pattern, are defined. Next, we propose an optimization algorithm based on Dynamic Priority First Response (DPFR) to solve the problem of sensing event scheduling. Finally, the approach presented in this paper has been validated to be valid and implemented through an actual development system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".