A Numerical Study on the Seismic Site Response of Rocky Valleys with Irregular Topographic Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates topographic effects of rocky valleys with irregular topographic conditions subjected to vertically propagating SV waves of Ricker type using a boundary element code. Valleys with two intersecting slopes, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], are modelled in order to study their combined effects on ground motion. Presented in the form of pseudo-acceleration response spectra, results of this work can be extended to similar topographies. The main findings are: (i) [Formula: see text] (the first slope angle) and [Formula: see text] (L is the half width of the valley and [Formula: see text] is its corresponding height) have amplifying effects, and [Formula: see text] (the second slope angle) has de-amplifying effects on the site response. (ii) [Formula: see text] has a straight effect on intensifying the effects of both [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. (iii) The combined effects of slope angles have been found to be important in modifying the response so more than a single slope should be considered for seismic analysis. (iv) Engineers should use the maximum amplification of 2.4 in case of valleys with the first and second slope angles below [Formula: see text].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".