Experiência sociodesportiva e a criação colaborativa de uma praça comunitária num bairro de Carnide = Socio sport experience and the collaborative creation of a community square in a Carnide neighborhood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esta comunicacao apresenta um processo de investigacao-acao em servico social, relevando o potencial da utilizacao de ferramentas sociodesportivas na intervencao comunitaria e socio-urbanistica, num bairro municipal de Lisboa, o bairro Padre Cruz, em Carnide. Para tal, e tomado como exemplo o projeto ‘Recriar BPC’ promovido por duas organizacoes sociodesportivas (Associacao Nacional de Futebol de Rua e Associacao Azimute Radical) no âmbito do programa municipal Bip/Zip – Parcerias Locais. O projeto apresentado consistiu num processo participado e coproduzido de intervencao comunitaria. Pretendeu, a partir da experiencia sociodesportiva dos jovens do bairro, propor formas alternativas de requalificar o espaco publico e de nele intervir, atraves da criacao colaborativa de uma praca comunitaria, com raizes na pratica sociodesportiva, nos modos de vida da populacao residente e nas necessidades do movimento associativo. Pretende disseminar praticas inovadoras e colaborar para o debate de um campo de saber sociodesportivo em servico social. This Communication presents a social work action research process, emphasizing the potential of using socio sportive tools in community and socio-urban intervention, in Padre Cruz municipal neighborhood, in Carnide civil parish, in Lisbon. Is taken as an example the ‘Recriar BPC’ project promoted by two local socio sportive organizations (Associacao Nacional de Futebol de Rua e Associacao Azimute Radical) in the context of municipal program Bip/Zip - Local Partnerships. The project had consisted in a participatory and coproduced process intended, from the socio sportive experience of young people in the neighborhood, to propose alternative ways to requalify public space through the collaborative creation of a community square, with roots in socio sportive practice, local lifestyles and needs from the associative movement. Intends to disseminate innovative practices and contribute to the debate of a field of socio sportive knowledge in social work. Palavras-chave / Keywords: Experiencia sociodesportiva, Intervencao comunitaria, Intervencao socio-urbanistica. Socio sport experience, Community intervention, Socio-urban intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".