MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890807850 · doi:10.1063/1.5034520

Effect of addition of SiC and Al2O3 refractories on Kapitza resistance of antimonide-telluride

2018· article· en· W2890807850 on OpenAlex
Nagaraj Nandihalli, Takao Mori, Holger Kleinke

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP Advances · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal properties of materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceThermal conductivityInterfacial thermal resistanceComposite materialThermal resistanceRADIUSAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ThermalThermodynamicsChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Invoking Effective Media Percolation theory (EMPT), Hasselaman-Johnson effective media theory (EMT), and Nan and Birringer EMT, the effect of addition of SiC and Al2O3 nanoparticles on Kapitza resistance (RBd) of Ni0.05Mo3Sb5.4Te1.6 was investigated. Pore size and their volume distribution, and surface area were characterized using BET technique to correlate pore effect and surface area on RBd. Bounds for effective thermal conductivity were determined using Lipton–Vernescu model. Variation of thermal conductance with respect to temperature was studied and compared with the results of other materials. According to EMPT, RBd in Ni0.05Mo3Sb5.4Te1.6/SiC composites ranged from 3.84 × 10-7 to 5.42 × 10-7 m2KW–1 and 3.36 × 10-7 to 3.86 × 10-7 m2KW–1 for Ni0.05Mo3Sb5.4Te1.6/Al2O3 composites. Kapitza radius (aK) for SiC samples was ranged between 2.01 – 2.84 μm; for Al2O3 samples it was 1.86 μm. Hasselman-Johnson model gave RBd values 55%, 51%, and 8% more than what EMPT is predicting, but of the same order and aK values 3.5 μm, 4 μm, 3 μm for SiC samples and 1.2 μm, 0.6 μm, 0.55 μm for Al2O3 samples. Nan-Birringer model yielded large aK of 7.25 μm and RBd ∼ 1.4 × 10–6 m2KW–1 for Ni0.05Mo3Sb5.4Te1.6/SiC. So obtained parameters are reasonable estimates. Variation of effective thermal conductivity in Al2O3 samples is more sensitive to particle size compared to SiC samples. Mechanical properties were studied using micro–indentation technique and their effect on effective thermal properties was ascertained. Addition of Al2O3 nanoparticles have aided in enhancing mechanical properties of bulk material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.420

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it