MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890808770 · doi:10.18687/laccei2018.1.1.51

Modal Calculations Using the Rigid Virtual Part in the Catia v5 Finite Element Software

2018· article· en· W2890808770 on OpenAlexafffund
Nader G. Zamani, Hamoon Ramezani

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 16th LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education, and Technology: “Innovation in Education and Inclusion” · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersUniversity of Windsor
KeywordsFinite element methodModalComputer scienceSoftwareModal analysisStructural engineeringComputational scienceComputer graphics (images)EngineeringProgramming languageMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concept of "rigid" element was introduced into the commercial FEA software in the early sixties. The main role of such an element was to account for special connections such as welding features, bolts, and specifying very stiff regions within the structure of interest. Unfortunately, with the passage of time, the functionalities/capabilities of such powerful elements have faded from the commercial FEA software documentation. As a result, such elements are the least "understood" and most "widely abused" features by an average user. This paper tries to address such an element within the confines of the Catia v5 commercial software with emphasis on modal and dynamic calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 16th LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education, and Technology: “Innovation in Education and Inclusion”Same topicManufacturing Process and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207