MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890821170 · doi:10.23889/ijpds.v3i4.843

Patterns of pharmacotherapies used to treat alcohol use disorders: A population-based administrative data study

2018· article· en· W2890821170 on OpenAlexaff
Nathan Nickel, Christine Leong, Heather J. Prior, Geoffrey Konrad, James M. Bolton, Leonard MacWilliam, Okechukwu Ekuma, Michael T. Paillé, Jeff Valdivia

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Population Data Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaManitoba Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcamprosateMedical prescriptionMedicineAlcohol use disorderPsychiatryMental healthPopulationDisulfiramAnxietyComorbidityAddictionAlcohol dependenceMoodNaltrexoneEnvironmental healthAlcoholPharmacologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroductionAlcohol use disorders (AUDs) – mental and/or physical health diagnoses due to harmful alcohol consumption – are associated with compromised quality of life for the individual. Over the past two decades, pharmacotherapies have been developed to treat alcohol addiction and may help mitigate the harmful outcomes linked with excessive alcohol. Objectives and ApproachThe objectives were to examine the pharmacotherapy dispensation patterns among individuals with an AUD and their mental health comorbidities. We used ICD codes from medical claims and hospital discharge data to identify anyone with a physical / mental health diagnosis due to harmful alcohol consumption – AUD, April 1, 1996-March 31, 2015. We identified mental health comorbidities using administrative health records. Drug dispensation data were used to identify all first-time prescriptions for acamprosate, naltrexone, or disulfiram occurring after an initial AUD diagnosis. Generalized linear models tested for predictors of receiving a prescription and to identify differences in mental health comorbidities. ResultsWe identified 53,556 treatment niave individuals with an AUD who were eligible to receive one of these three prescriptions. 493 of these received a prescription for acamprosate, naltrexone, or disulfiram. The majority of prescriptions came from general practitioners from urban centers. Those with a prescription were significantly more likely to have a comorbid mood or anxiety diagnosis. Those with a prescription were more likely to have a physician visit for a mental health issue a year to two years before diagnosis compared with those who did not have a prescription; and, they were more likely to be dispensed a selective serotonin, a sedative, and an anti-anxiety medication prior to receiving an AUD diagnosis. Conclusion/ImplicationsDrug therapies to aid in the recovery from AUD are being underutilized. Diagnosis of and treatment for mental health disorders is more common among those dispensed these medications. Programs that study clinicians’ use of AUD-targeted drug therapies should be considered, while psychiatric services in addiction care require significant improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.294
GPT teacher head0.503
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Population Data ScienceSame topicSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207