Photophysical properties of novel fluorescent 1-(3-Hydroxy-benzofuran-2-yl)-benzo[f]chromen-3-one derivative: models for correlation solvent polarity scales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Photophysical and spectral properties of a new benzofuran-derivative-based fluorescent probe 1-(3-Hydroxy-benzofuran-2-yl)-benzo[f]chromen-3-one (1-HBBC) were considered in various parameters of solvents, making use of UV–Vis absorption and fluorescence emission spectroscopy. The absorption and fluorescence emission peak maxima were observed between 260–349 and 400–485 nm, respectively, prompting Stokes’ shift between 13 993 and 18 495 cm−1. Diverse solvent parameters have been utilized to understand the solvatochromism of 1-HBBC. This information is applied to understand the effects of the solvent, on the shifting in the spectra of 1-HBBC and access the execution of empirical solvatochromic models: the well-known Kamlet–Taft model and two recent Catalan models. Linear solvation energy relationships proposed by the Kamlet–Taft treatment for the 1-HBBC molecule indicate that it is appealing as a molecule for the hydrogen bond and solvent polarity properties it has exhibited. The models offer good statistical execution for all solvents studied in this work. A general decency of fit is found for benzofuran values for the models’ contractions, whereas these solvents are incorporated directly into the solvatochromic analysis. These reductions are comparable for the Kamlet–Taft and Catalan 4P models but important for the Catalan 3P model. The results shown herein can be used for outlining new luminescent tests for nonpolar and polar microenvironment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".