MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890886020 · doi:10.1139/juvs-2017-0029

Measuring low-altitude wind gusts using the unmanned aerial vehicle GustAV

2018· article· en· W2890886020 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Alton Yeung, Goetz Bramesfeld, Joon Chung, S. P. Foster

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace and Aviation Technology
Canadian institutionsBarrie Urology GroupToronto Metropolitan University
FundersMolson FoundationOntario Centres of Excellence
KeywordsFlight testLow altitudeMeteorologyAltitude (triangle)Environmental scienceAerospace engineeringTurbulenceRemote sensingWind speedMarine engineeringAeronauticsEngineeringPhysicsGeologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A small unmanned aerial vehicle (SUAV) was developed with the specific objective to explore atmospheric wind gusts at low altitudes below 500 m. These gusts have significant impact on the flight characteristics and performance of SUAVs. The SUAV carried an advanced air-data system that includes a five-hole probe, which was adapted for this specific application. In several flight tests the entire test system was qualified and gust data were recorded. The subsequent experimentally derived gust data were post-processed and compared with turbulence spectra of the MIL-HDBK-1797 von Kármán turbulence model. On the day of the flight test, the experimental results did not fully match the prediction of the von Kármán model. Meanwhile, the wind measuring apparatus were proven to be able to measure gust during flight. Therefore, a broader sampling will be required to generalize the gust measurements and be compared with the existing models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Unmanned Vehicle SystemsSame topicAerospace and Aviation TechnologyFrench-language works237,207