MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890918966 · doi:10.7202/1050939ar

ENSEIGNER LA LITTÉRATURE AVEC DES BANDES-ANNONCES LITTÉRAIRES OU CE QUE LES BOOK TRAILERS FONT AUX OEUVRES LITTÉRAIRES

2018· article· fr· W2890918966 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Aldo Gennaï, Maïté Eugène

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de recherches en littératie médiatique multimodale · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le book trailer ou bande-annonce littéraire est un outil publicitaire conçu sur le modèle des bandes-annonces cinématographiques : une brève séquence filmée visant à annoncer et promouvoir un livre. Des enseignants se sont emparés des bandes-annonces littéraires et les ont intégrées aux dispositifs didactiques d’enseignement de la littérature, au service d’objectifs d’enseignement-apprentissage variés. Nous proposons d’examiner ce qu’il advient des textes et des oeuvres lus dans les book trailers. Nous formulons l’hypothèse que l’objet détermine en partie la manière dont les élèves y représentent les oeuvres littéraires, en raison de sa nature multimodale et numérique résultant d’un processus de transposition intermédiatique, en raison également de son format et de ses fonctions promotionnelles premières. L’analyse des données collectées dans deux classes de lycée en France révèle que les bandes-annonces littéraires entraînent une reconfiguration des textes, qui opère au niveau registral et générique, et oriente leur appropriation et l’expression de cette appropriation vers le spectaculaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.139

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.214
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.129 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de recherches en littératie médiatique multimodaleSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207