MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890919377 · doi:10.9778/cmajo.20180020

Growth hormone treatment of Canadian children: results from the GeNeSIS phase IV prospective observational study

2018· article· en· W2890919377 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Cheri Deal, Susan Kirsch, Jean‐Pierre Chanoine, Sarah Lawrence, Elizabeth Cummings, Elizabeth Rosolowsky, Seth D. Marks, Nan Jia, Christopher J. Child

Bibliographic record

VenueCMAJ Open · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of WinnipegChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaAlberta Health ServicesCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineEli Lilly (Canada)Izaak Walton Killam Health CentreBC Children's HospitalDalhousie UniversityChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservational studyPhase (matter)MedicineHormonePediatricsInternal medicineChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background:</h3> Country-specific data on outcomes of treatment with recombinant human growth hormone are lacking. We present such data for children treated with growth hormone in Canada. <h3>Methods:</h3> We describe characteristics and outcomes of 850 children (mean age at baseline 8.5 yr) treated with growth hormone constituting the Canadian cohort of the multinational phase IV prospective observational Genetics and Neuroendocrinology of Short-stature International Study (GeNeSIS). The diagnosis associated with short stature was as determined by the investigator. Auxological data were evaluated yearly until near-adult height. Adverse events were assessed in all growth-hormone–treated patients. <h3>Results:</h3> The diagnosis ascribed as the cause of short stature was growth hormone deficiency in 526 children (61.9%), predominantly organic rather than idiopathic, particularly congenital pituitary abnormalities and intracranial tumours. All diagnostic groups with sufficient patients for analysis had increased height velocity standard deviation score (SDS) and height SDS during growth hormone treatment. For patients who reached near-adult height (<i>n</i> = 293), the mean height SDS was within the normal range for about 80% of patients with organic growth hormone deficiency (<i>n</i> = 131) or idiopathic growth hormone deficiency (<i>n</i> = 50), 50% of patients with idiopathic short stature (<i>n</i> = 10) and 46% of patients with Turner syndrome (<i>n</i> = 79). Eleven deaths were reported, 7 in patients with organic growth hormone deficiency. Serious adverse events considered related to growth hormone treatment (<i>n</i> = 19) were isolated except for medulloblastoma recurrence (<i>n</i> = 2) and adenoidal hypertrophy (<i>n</i> = 2). <h3>Interpretation:</h3> Growth hormone treatment was effective and had a good safety profile in Canadian children. Growth hormone dosages were lower than in the US and global GeNeSIS cohorts, and a greater proportion of treated Canadian children had organic growth hormone deficiency. <h3>Study registration:</h3> ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT01088412.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.643
Threshold uncertainty score0.914

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCMAJ OpenSame topicGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsFrench-language works237,207