MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Los anuncios de Don Quijote en la prensa mexicana (1822-1852)

2018· article· es· W2890941748 on OpenAlexaff
Ivan Baruj Vázquez Clavellina

Bibliographic record

VenueBibliographica · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLibraries, Manuscripts, and Books
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A principios del siglo XIX diferentes editores, impresores y libreros distribuyeron el Quijote de Cervantes en la Ciudad de México; los empresarios aprovecharon espacios comerciales en la prensa para promocionar sus ediciones. Esta investigación recupera anuncios con objeto de identificar ejemplares de esa obra durante las tres primeras décadas del México independiente. Las búsquedas se llevaron a cabo en las hemerotecas digitales de México y España; los resultados localizaron datos sobre 10 ediciones elaboradas en Madrid, París, Barcelona y México. Los anuncios ayudaron a entender la comercialización de la obra y contribuyeron a reconocer aspectos sobre su difusión entre los lectores mexicanos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.275

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBibliographicaSame topicLibraries, Manuscripts, and BooksFrench-language works237,207