Estimation of original kerogen type and hydrogen index using inorganic geochemical proxies: Implications for assessing shale gas potential in the Devonian Horn River Formation of western Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Considerable attention has been directed to the Devonian Horn River Formation in western Canada with respect to geochemical evaluation of gas-generation and storage potential. Because organic geochemical analyses are not always useful for characterizing the type and amount of original organic matter, we surmise the original kerogen type and original hydrogen index (HIo) and subsequently estimate a reliable original total organic carbon (TOCo) based on a combination of inorganic and organic geochemical data. Productivity (SiO2 and Ba) and terrestrial input (Al2O3, Hf, Nb, and Zr) proxies are used to estimate original kerogen types, which suggest that the Evie and Muskwa Members formed under conditions of high productivity and minor terrestrial input. These members also formed under reducing conditions, as indicated by the redox proxies (Mo, U, and Th/U). Under such conditions, primarily type II kerogen was preserved. By considering the fraction of biogenic silica, the estimated HIo values (400–500 mg hydrocarbon/g total organic carbon [TOC]) for the middle Otter Park Member are lower than that for Evie and Muskwa Members and higher than the upper and lower Otter Park Member. The stronger correlation between TOCo and trace elements suggests that HIo is useful for reconstructing the coherent variation in TOCo. Based on the original kerogen type and TOCo, the gas-generation and storage potentials of the Evie, middle Otter Park, and Muskwa Members are higher than those of other members. The source-rock potential is excellent for the Evie Member with an approximately 75% difference between TOCo and measured present-day TOC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".