MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2890965859 · doi:10.3390/s18092952

An Autonomous Vehicle Navigation System Based on Inertial and Visual Sensors

2018· article· en· W2890965859 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNatural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang ProvinceChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsInertial measurement unitInertial navigation systemGyroscopeNavigation systemComputer scienceReliability (semiconductor)Wind triangleComputer visionArtificial intelligenceInertial frame of referenceEngineeringSimulationRobotMobile robotAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The strapdown inertial navigation system (SINS) is widely used in autonomous vehicles. However, the random drift error of gyroscope leads to serious accumulated navigation errors during long continuous operation of SINS alone. In this paper, we propose to combine the Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) data with the line feature parameters from a camera to improve the navigation accuracy. The proposed method can also maintain the autonomy of the navigation system. Experimental results show that the proposed inertial-visual navigation system can mitigate the SINS drift and improve the accuracy, stability, and reliability of the navigation system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score0.731

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it