Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this thesis is to help provide safety in third world countries with the use of shelters. Due to the current global political climate of crisis, the need for shelter, or safety is a growing concern for a large number of people. Rather than focusing on the issue of sheltering those who are displaced during a time of crisis, this thesis looks at the critical need for shelter for people who stay behind in urban centers. This choice led to researching bomb shelters, which are temporary dwellings used in times of extreme duress. This thesis examines the possibility of channeling multiple existing underground subway systems in Tehran to create an alternative underground metropolis for times of crisis, which can help the individuals who choose to stay in the city during a time of crisis, due to complications, or necessity. Furthermore, this thesis provides a design that supports individuals through a crisis experience, when they are faced by emotional challenges. I investigate how architecture can provide a means to cope with emergency and crisis, through the strategic development of an underground shelter. In this context, some of the relevant design questions include: A Temporary Dwelling in Times of Extreme Duress By
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".