Recovering the underlying trajectory from sparse and irregular longitudinal data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, we consider the problem of recovering the underlying trajectory when the longitudinal data are sparsely and irregularly observed and noise‐contaminated. Such data are popularly analyzed with functional principal component analysis via the principal analysis by conditional estimation (PACE) method. The PACE method may sometimes be numerically unstable because it involves the inverse of the covariance matrix. We propose a sparse orthonormal approximation (SOAP) method as an alternative. It estimates the optimal empirical basis functions in the best approximation framework rather than eigen‐decomposing the covariance function. The SOAP method avoids estimating the mean and covariance function, which is challenging when the assembled time points with observations for all subjects are not sufficiently dense. The method also avoids the inverse of the covariance matrix, hence the computation is more stable. It does not require the functional principal component scores to follow the Gaussian distribution. We show that the SOAP estimate for the optimal empirical basis function is asymptotically consistent. The finite‐sample performance of the SOAP method is investigated in simulation studies in comparison with the PACE method. Our method is demonstrated by recovering the CD4 percentage curves from sparse and irregular data in a multi‐centre AIDS cohort study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it