The survey of psychological status, family factors and risk factors of irritable bowel syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
目的: 探讨肠易激综合征(Irritable Bowel Syndrome,IBS)患者情绪、人格特质、述情特点、疾病观念与求医行为及家庭情况等因素及相关的危险因素.方法: 2010年7月至2012年1月在云南省第二人民医院消化科门诊及病房,通过方便取样对 126 例符合罗马Ⅲ标准的IBS患者,进行腹部症状及严重程度调查,同时进行焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、家庭环境量表(FES)、系统家庭动力学自评量表(SSFD)、艾森克人格问卷(EPQA)、多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS)、疾病观念与求医行为量表(ICHSB)等问卷调查,并将调查结果与126例健康志愿者进行比较. 结果: 1.IBS组抑郁、焦虑、家庭环境因子V、艾森克因子N和因子总分、多伦多述情障碍因子Ⅱ[分别为(40.23±6.96)分,(38.73±7.49)分,(6.78±1.57)分,(13.67±5.37)分,(43.11±7.12)分,(23.12±4.42)分],高于对照组[分别为(36.43±7.25)分,(32.08 ±7.25)分,(5.72±2.01)分,(11.22±5.43)分,(39.38±6.75)分,(20.92±3.95)分]；多伦多述情障碍因子Ⅲ(14.73±4.13)分低于对照组(15.11±3.48)分,差异具有显著性(P＜0.05).2.腹部症状与抑郁、焦虑、系统家庭动力学因子Ⅲ和因子总分、疾病观念与求医行为因子Ⅱ呈正相关,与家庭环境因子Ⅰ和因子Ⅸ呈负相关.3.焦虑、成功性、年龄、缺乏识别情感和躯体感受的能力为危险因素,受教育年限为保护因素. 结论: IBS患者易伴有抑郁、焦虑情绪,家庭成员支持少、家庭规则不明确者症状重；焦虑、竞争性活动、缺乏识别情感和躯体感受的能力为危险因素.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".