Improvement in Compressive Behavior of Alkali-treated Wood Fibre-reinforced Bio-based Polyurethane Foams
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alkali-treated wood fibre-reinforced polyurethane (PU) foams were fabricated with a free-rising foaming process. The surface chemistry of alkali-treated wood fibres was characterized using in situ Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and the fibre surface morphology was explored using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). X-ray computed tomography (CT) was performed to observe the cell structure of foams incorporating the treated wood fibres. Compression tests were conducted and the influence of treated fibres on the compressive strength and modulus of PU foam was investigated. The foams reinforced with treated fibres exhibited increase of 40% in strength and 64% in modulus. The high surface roughness and high aspect ratio of the treated fibres contributed to these improved mechanical properties through enhanced interfacial bond strengths.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it