Identification of shallow geohazard channels based on discontinuity seismic attributes in the South Caspian Sea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Identification of geomorphological features in seismic data is a key element of seismic interpretation. Channels in the shallow subsurface are potential geohazards. At deeper levels, they can be the actual targets for (horizontal) drilling. Either way, it is important to optimally delineate these features prior to well location positioning and drilling. We have studied a poststack 3D seismic data from the South Caspian Sea featuring shallow channels that are considered potential geohazards for drilling operations. In the first step, we attenuate the acquisition footprints along the inline direction using a geostatistics approach based on factorial kriging. To better visualize channels in the presence of stratigraphic dips, we create a dense set of horizons using an inversion-based flattening algorithm. In the next step, we compare various discontinuity attributes such as semblance, similarity, curvature, and the relatively new attribute based on the multiscale and multidirectional shearlet transformation to determine which one best images our features of interest. Curvature attributes clearly image channel levies (positive curvature) and channel centers (negative curvature). Lateral changes in the curvature magnitude infer sedimentation from the north. Similarity, semblance, and shearlet transform attributes also successfully delineate channel edges, but these attributes do not contain additional geologic information. In the final step, we qualitatively analyze channel thickness variations by the red-green-blue blending of three spectral components based on short window Fourier transforms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".